Phase Planning Overview
The DRKM Blueprint System follows a deliberate four-phase plan. Each phase has clear entry and exit criteria, specific deliverables, and measurable success metrics.
Phase 1: Seed (Weeks 1-2)
Goals
- Define what a blueprint system should be
- Establish governance and team structure
- Create complete specifications
- Establish decision-making framework
Deliverables
- Design System Brief (complete)
- Content Architecture Spec (complete)
- Repo Template Spec (complete)
- Master Operating Prompt (complete)
- Decision Log (7+ decisions)
- Risk Register (3+ risks)
- Team and Governance documentation
- This documentation site
Activities
- Specification writing and review
- Architecture decisions
- Design direction setting
- Governance structure definition
- Team role clarification
Timeline
- Start: Week 1 (2026-03-28)
- End: Week 2 (2026-04-04)
- Actual: Completed 2026-04-04
Entry Criteria
- Team available and aligned
- Project direction clear
- Time blocked on calendars
Exit Criteria
- All specifications approved
- Decision log finalized
- No major gaps identified in specs
- Team understands phase 2 plan
- Go/no-go decision made (go)
Success Metrics
- Specifications comprehensive (coverage >95%)
- Specifications clear (team understands them)
- Governance working (decisions made quickly)
- No contradictions between specs
Lessons Learned
- Writing specifications is faster than expected
- Collaborative review prevents rework
- Clear ownership (Greg/Kristina/Rafa) accelerates decisions
- Markus validation catches incomplete specs early
---
Phase 2: Formation (Weeks 3-4)
Goals
- Build the template system
- Implement build and deploy infrastructure
- Create complete component library
- Establish development workflow
Deliverables
- Next.js application scaffold
- 7 fully functional page templates
- Component library (40+ components)
- Build pipeline (npm scripts)
- Deploy pipeline (GitHub Actions)
- Cloudflare Pages configuration
- TypeScript and Zod setup
- Complete development documentation
Activities
- Next.js scaffold setup
- Template implementation (7 pages)
- Component implementation
- Build/deploy pipeline
- Local development testing
- Type safety setup
- Validation schemas
Timeline
- Start: Week 3 (2026-04-07)
- End: Week 4 (2026-04-14)
- Estimated duration: 7-10 days
- Buffer: 3-4 days for issues
Entry Criteria
- Seed phase complete
- Specifications finalized and approved
- Team bandwidth available
- Development environment ready
Exit Criteria
- npm ci succeeds
- npm run dev serves local site
- npm run build completes in <60s
- npm run export produces static files
- All 7 templates render correctly
- GitHub Actions deploy pipeline works
- Cloudflare Pages accessible
- No TypeScript errors in codebase
- Zod validation covers all data types
- Lighthouse scores >90
Success Metrics
- All 7 templates implemented
- Build time <60 seconds
- Page load time <2 seconds
- Zero TypeScript errors
- Validation catches all invalid content
- Deploy pipeline 100% automated
Key Risks
- Template complexity (mitigation: start simple)
- TypeScript learning curve (mitigation: use strict mode)
- Zod schema complexity (mitigation: incremental schemas)
Transition Criteria to Phase 3
- All exit criteria met
- Deployment to production working
- Team confident in tooling
- Ready to deploy real content
---
Phase 3: Build (Weeks 5-8)
Goals
- Deploy reference blueprints
- Test specification completeness
- Gather real-world feedback
- Fix gaps and edge cases
- Validate system works end-to-end
Deliverables
- System documentation blueprint (this site)
- 1-2 reference project blueprints
- Specification refinements based on feedback
- Deployment runbooks
- Troubleshooting guides
- Team training materials
Activities
- Content creation for reference blueprints
- Testing blueprint generation process
- Gathering team feedback
- Specification adjustments
- Documentation refinements
- Training Markus on generation
Timeline
- Start: Week 5 (2026-04-14)
- End: Week 8 (2026-05-05)
- Estimated duration: 3-4 weeks
- Buffer: 1 week for iteration
Entry Criteria
- Formation phase complete
- All exit criteria met
- Reference content ready
- Team trained on system
Exit Criteria
- System documentation site live
- 1-2 reference blueprints deployed
- All required information present
- No critical gaps identified
- Team can navigate in <5 seconds
- Specification gaps identified and logged
- Feedback collected from stakeholders
Success Metrics
- 100% of planned blueprints deployed
- Information findability <5 seconds
- Zero critical gaps
- Team feedback positive
- Specification integrity maintained
Key Risks
- Specification gaps (mitigation: early feedback)
- Scope creep (mitigation: fixed scope per blueprint)
- Content quality (mitigation: clear review process)
Transition Criteria to Phase 4
- 1-2 reference blueprints successfully deployed
- Specification refinements complete
- Team confident in process
- Ready to automate
---
Phase 4: Mature (Weeks 9+)
Goals
- Full automation of scaffold generation
- Performance optimization
- Support multiple concurrent projects
- Enable self-service blueprint creation
- Establish continuous improvement
Deliverables
- Fully automated scaffold generation
- 5+ deployed project blueprints
- Self-service creation tools/documentation
- Monitoring and analytics
- Performance optimizations
- Continuous improvement process
Activities
- Automating repetitive tasks
- Optimizing build and deploy
- Adding monitoring and alerting
- Performance profiling and optimization
- Self-service documentation
- Training operations team
Timeline
- Start: Week 9 (2026-05-06)
- Ongoing: No fixed end
- Continuous improvements expected
Entry Criteria
- Build phase complete
- 1-2 blueprints successfully deployed
- Process proven and documented
- Team ready to scale
Success Metrics
- 5+ blueprints deployed
- Markus fully autonomous
- Build time <60 seconds consistently
- Page load time <2 seconds
- Zero manual intervention needed
- Team satisfaction high
- System ready for expansion
Continuous Evolution
Phase 4 never truly ends. The system continuously evolves:- Feedback from new projects
- Technology updates
- Process improvements
- New features or capabilities
---